🔗 Share this article

One of some of the most recognizable pictures from the twentieth century portrays an unclothed girl, her arms extended, her features distorted in pain, her body burned and flaking. She appears dashing in the direction of the photographer after running from an airstrike within South Vietnam. To her side, other children are racing away from the devastated hamlet of Trảng Bàng, amid a background featuring black clouds and troops.

The Global Effect from a Single Image

Shortly after the release in June 1972, this photograph—formally called "The Terror of War"—became a traditional phenomenon. Witnessed and debated by countless people, it's broadly attributed for galvanizing global sentiment against the American involvement in Southeast Asia. A prominent critic later observed that the deeply lasting photograph of the young Kim Phúc in agony probably was more effective to heighten global outrage against the war than a hundred hours of broadcast barbarities. A legendary English war photographer who covered the war labeled it the most powerful photograph from what would later be called “The Television War”. A different veteran war journalist stated how the photograph is simply put, one of the most important photos in history, particularly of that era.

A Long-Held Claim Followed by a Recent Claim

For 53 years, the photo was assigned to the work of Nick Út, an emerging South Vietnamese photographer employed by a major news agency during the war. But a provocative new film streaming on a streaming service claims that the famous picture—often hailed as the apex of war journalism—might have been shot by another person on the scene during the attack.

As claimed by the investigation, "Napalm Girl" was actually captured by a stringer, who offered his photos to the news agency. The assertion, and its subsequent inquiry, originates with an individual called a former photo editor, who states how the powerful bureau head instructed the staff to alter the photo's byline from the stringer to the staff photographer, the sole AP staff photographer present that day.

The Quest for the Real Story

The source, advanced in years, reached out to one of the journalists a few years ago, asking for assistance to locate the unnamed cameraman. He mentioned how, if he could be found, he wished to extend an apology. The journalist thought of the unsupported photojournalists he had met—likening them to modern freelancers, similar to independent journalists in that era, are often ignored. Their contributions is often doubted, and they function amid more challenging situations. They lack insurance, no long-term security, they don’t have support, they usually are without proper gear, and they are incredibly vulnerable while photographing in familiar settings.

The filmmaker asked: How would it feel to be the man who took this iconic picture, should it be true that he was not the author?” As a photographer, he imagined, it could be extraordinarily painful. As a student of war photography, especially the vaunted documentation of the era, it could prove earth-shattering, maybe career-damaging. The respected heritage of the photograph within Vietnamese-Americans meant that the creator with a background emigrated during the war was hesitant to pursue the film. He said, I hesitated to disrupt the established story attributed to Nick the photograph. And I didn’t want to disrupt the status quo among a group that had long looked up to this success.”

This Investigation Develops

However both the filmmaker and his collaborator agreed: it was important raising the issue. When reporters are going to hold everybody else accountable,” noted the journalist, it is essential that we are willing to address tough issues of ourselves.”

The film documents the investigators as they pursue their inquiry, from testimonies from observers, to requests in present-day Ho Chi Minh City, to reviewing records from additional films recorded at the time. Their search finally produce a candidate: Nguyễn Thành Nghệ, a driver for a news network that day who occasionally sold photographs to the press on a freelance basis. According to the documentary, a moved the claimant, now also in his 80s based in California, attests that he handed over the famous picture to the AP for a small fee with a physical photo, but was plagued by not being acknowledged for years.

The Response and Further Scrutiny

He is portrayed in the footage, reserved and reflective, but his story turned out to be explosive within the community of journalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to