🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined a collective professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."